Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

backports-7.0.x: dpdk: add interrupt (power-saving) mode v1 #10226

Conversation

lukashino
Copy link
Contributor

When the packet load is low, Suricata can run in interrupt mode. This more resembles the classic approach of processing packets - CPU cores run low and only fetch packets on interrupt.

https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/6696

When the packet load is low, Suricata can run in interrupt
mode. This more resembles the classic approach of processing
packets - CPU cores run low and only fetch packets
on interrupt.

Ticket: OISF#6696
(cherry picked from commit 2a28980)
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6e9d790) 82.17% compared to head (232c147) 82.14%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           main-7.0.x   #10226      +/-   ##
==============================================
- Coverage       82.17%   82.14%   -0.04%     
==============================================
  Files             974      974              
  Lines          274579   274579              
==============================================
- Hits           225639   225547      -92     
- Misses          48940    49032      +92     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 63.17% <ø> (-0.09%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 61.16% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
unittests 62.92% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information:

ERROR: QA failed on SURI_TLPW1_files_sha256.

field baseline test %
SURI_TLPR1_stats_chk
.app_layer.error.http.parser 1108 724 65.34%

Pipeline 17719

@lukashino
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased in #10558

@lukashino lukashino closed this Mar 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants